Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
Follow the Audi Mileage Marathon starting Monday morning
Paris 2008: MINI Crossover Concept
Paris 2008: Aston Martin One-77 (partially) revealed
Paris 2008: The GT by Citroen. No, the whole thing this time
Paris 2008: Lamborghini Estoque LIVE
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Chevy Corvette Z06
Autoline on Autoblog with John McElroy
Paris 2008: Le Day 1 Wrapup
Knight Rider: The Liveblog -- Season 1, Episode 2
By the Numbers - September 2008: Nobody Wins Edition
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
DriftPunch @ Mar 29th 2006 4:07PM
The variance of what people spend on auto's and keeping them on the road makes this data kind of useless. While they may be sound, too much choice is involved to make them useful in decisionmaking. It's no different than comparing grocery bills. A single person can spend little on a nutritious haul, whereas another can spend a fortune on name brand snack food. The choice factor changes the way the commidity is viewed.
This being said, what some pay in insurance in other parts of the country blow my mind. I pay ~$900 a year for a 1994 GMC and a 1999 4Runner here in Central Virginia.